Holder DNA Genealogy Project - Holders of southeastern North Carolina

 

 

Group J: Descendants of Sion Holder

 

030 USA: Sion Holder b. abt 1821 NC m. Sarah Harvill, in Harnett Co. NC 1860 and 1870 > Thomas Jefferson Holder b. abt 1858 NC d. ? FL spouse 1) Flora Margaret Priest, NC 2) Mattie Lee Campbell, FL. This sample is from a descendant of the second marriage.

053 USA: Sion Holder b. abt. 1821 NC, m. Sarah Harvill, in Harnett Co. NC 1860 and 1870 > Neill A. Holder, lived Robeson Co. NC.

056 USA: Sion Holder b. abt 1821 NC m. Sarah Harvill, in Harnett Co. NC 1860 and 1870 > Thomas Jefferson Holder b. abt 1858 NC and first wife Flora Priest > Neill Jefferson Holder (1884-1963), lived NC.

Although samples 030 and 056 descend from different wives of Thomas Jefferson Holder, this does not affect their Y-DNA. These two samples differ at marker DYS391. Since samples 030 and 053 have the identical value (11) at this marker, yet samples 030 and 056 have a more recent ancestor in common than does either with 053, we can infer that sample 056 has a relatively recent mutation at this site.

These three samples also have a large number of matches to persons with other surnames, notably Elliot.

 

Other samples from the same area:

Three other samples have been received from people whose ancestry traces back to the same part of North Carolina, and whose autosomal DNA tests strongly suggest a relationship. The data for these samples have been added to the chart below. Like the Group J samples, sample 099 is in Haplogroup R1b (R-M269) but it differs significantly from these. It seems very unlikely that there is a common ancestor within the last 300 years or more.

099 USA: George Holder ca 1750, Duplin and Sampson Counties NC. Based on location we predicted this sample would fall in group J, but it appears to be unrelated, and doesn't match any other Holder sample so far.

 

Samples 091 and 101 match each other, and are from an entirely different haplogroup, T-M70. We are designating this pair as Group W within the Holder project.

091. USA: William Holder b. 1793 and Sabre Keen, lived Cumberland Co. NC > William Holder b. 1816 and Nancy Mason, Harnett Co. NC > Malcolm James Holder (1851-1916) and Sarah Jane McLean. This sample matches sample 101, but we have not yet identified a common ancestor.

101 USA: Nelson Holder Ritchie, (1840-1913), born in Missouri to parents whose names we don't know yet. In the 1880 and later censuses, he says his parents were from North Carolina.

 


 

The Group J samples, and sample 099, belong to Haplogroup R1b1b2, now known as R-M269. This haplogroup is prevalent in western Europe, especially in the British Isles.

The Group W samples are in Haplogroup T-M70, which is found especially in Somalia, the Arabian peninsula, and Armenia.

 

 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

ID#

Group

DYS
393

DYS
390

DYS
19

DYS
391

DYS
385a
DYS
385b

DYS
426

DYS
388

DYS
439

DYS
389-1

DYS
392

DYS
389-2

DYS
458
DYS
459a
DYS
459b

DYS
455

DYS
454

DYS
447

DYS
437

DYS
448

DYS
449
DYS
464a
DYS
464b
DYS
464c

DYS
464d

030

J1

13

25

14

11

11

14

12

12

12

13

13

29

18

9

9

11

11

25

15

19

29

15

15

17

17

053

J1

13

25

14

11

11

14

12

12

12

13

13

29

18

9

9

11

11

25

15

19

29

15

15

17

17

056

J1

13

25

14

10

11

14

12

12

12

13

13

29

18

9

9

11

11

25

15

19

29

15

15

17

17

 

099

 

13

24

14

11

11

15

12

12

12

12

13

28

18

9

9

11

11

25

15

19

28

14

15

17

17

 

091

W

13

23

13

10

13

16

11

12

12

14

13

30

17

9

9

11

12

26

15

19

33

11

14

14

16

101

W

13

23

13

10

13

16

11

12

12

14

13

30

18

9

9

11

12

26

15

19

33

11

14

14

16

 
 

 

Consistent with their more recent ancestor in common, samples 030 and 056 are identical at markers 26 through 37, but differ from 053 at three rapidly changing markers.

 
 
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37

ID#

Group

DYS
460

GATA
H4

YCA
IIa

YCA
IIb

DYS
456

DYS
607

DYS
576
DYS
570
CDY
  a
CDY
  b

DYS
442

DYS
438

030

J1

11

11

19

23

15

16

18

17

40

41

12

12

053

J1

11

11

19

23

16

16

18

18

39

41

12

12

056

J1

11

11

19

23

15

16

18

17

40

41

12

12

 

 

Samples 030 and 053 have been tested for markers 37-67, and are identical over this set.
This is consistent with what we've observed in other groups; markers 26-37 generally show more variation than 38-67.

 
 
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47

ID#

Group

DYS
531

DYS
578

DYS
395
S1a

DYS
395
S1b

DYS
590

DYS
537

DYS
641

DYS
472

DYS
406
S1

DYS
511

030

J1

11

9

15

16

8

10

10

8

11

10

053

J1

11

9

15

16

8

10

10

8

11

10

 

 
 
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60

ID#

Group

DYS
425

DYS
413a

DYS
413b

DYS
557

DYS
594

DYS
436

DYS
490

DYS
534

DYS
450

DYS
444

DYS
481

DYS
520

DYS
446

030

J1

12

23

23

16

10

12

12

14

8

12

22

20

13

053

J1

12

23

23

16

10

12

12

14

8

12

22

20

13

 

 
 
61
62
63
64
65
66
67

ID#

Group

DYS
617

DYS
568

DYS
487

DYS
572

DYS
640

DYS
492

DYS
565

030

J1

13

11

13

12

12

12

12

053

J1

13

11

13

12

12

12

12

 

 

back to Holder family results page

back to Holder family home page